Spring naar inhoud

Our internal economic value creation

Our internal economic value creation

By operating our energy infrastructure we make energy available to society. We generate measurable economic value for the users of our grids, our ‘external value creation’. However, the management, maintenance and expansion of our networks also provide value for stakeholders other than the direct users. Our business operations and investments, and the focus we have on risk management, innovation and cost efficiency lead to internal value creation. It ensures that our employees receive their wages, our suppliers get paid, our bondholders collect interest and the government receives dividends and tax revenues. In this section we look at the long-term internal economic value we generated in 2021. 

Related material topics: 
No. 2 Financial performance and resilience 
No. 5 Developments in laws and regulations 
No. 7 Strong market position 
No. 8 Cybersecurity, data security and privacy 

Related SDGs:
8  

Relevant stakeholders:
Employees
Suppliers
Investors
Shareholder
Regulatory authorities

Value created

Omschrijving  
Remuneration of third parties 57
Interest expenses 63
Tax burden 110
Employee benefits 198
Dividend (to be paid in 2022) 218
Net realised profit 311
Purchased from suppliers 850

Value creation for our creditors

We not only look to our operations for cost savings, we also seek to reduce costs in our financing. To be able to perform our duties towards our customers and make the investments we deem necessary, we want to have access to the local and international money and capital market. Having an adequate credit rating is essential for this.

Stable high credit rating

Our credit ratings remained at the same high level in 2021. The most important reasons behind these good ratings were our solid financial profile, having the Dutch state as a shareholder, clarity with regard to the Dutch and German regulatory frameworks in the coming years, and the important role played by Gasunie in achieving European and Dutch energy transition objectives. 

  2021 2020 2019
Standard & Poor’s AA- AA- AA-
Moody’s Investors Service A1 A1 A1

Our financing activities in 2021

In 2021, we used our credit facility with the European Investment Bank (EIB) to finance the new nitrogen plant in Zuidbroek. In May, we borrowed € 90 million for 9 years at an interest rate of 0.258%. In June, we borrowed € 150 million for 8 years at an interest rate of 0.127%. 

The committed credit facility was extended by one year in March 2021 and now has a term until April 2026. The RCF amounts to € 600 million and the facility includes KPIs for sustainability. When these KPIs are met, we are granted a discount on the annual credit provision costs.

Sustainability-Linked Bond

The new bond is a so-called Sustainability-Linked Bond (SLB). With this bond we want to show that we want to be judged on our sustainability policy, and more specifically on our new hard goals to significantly reduce CO2 and CH4 emissions in our gas transport by 2030.

The first target is specific to the gas transportation sector and involves reducing methane emissions by about 75% compared to 1990 and 50% compared to 2020. The latter is clearly more than the 30% reduction target recently published as part of the Global Methane Pledge.

The second target relates to Gasunie's self-imposed CO2 equivalent emissions, which it must reduce by 30% by 2030 compared to 2020 based on a relative-value measure. Within the SLB, the self-imposed sustainability targets can result in a coupon increase of 0.10% if Gasunie fails to meet one target by December 31, 2030, and of 0.20% if the company fails to meet both targets.

Gasunie is the first European gas transport company to issue an SLB. According to ISS-ESG, which carried out a second party opinion study, the sustainability performance targets ('Sustainability Performance Targets') in Gasunie's Framework are 'ambitious' compared to Gasunie's sustainability performance and industry peers. The Framework and the second party opinion can be found on the Gasunie website.

See also OGMP paragraph.

In June we repaid a bond loan of € 300 million. In October, we issued a € 300 million bond loan with a tenor of 15 years at an effective interest rate of 0.763%. The revenue from this new bond was used to repay a bond loan of € 433 million maturing in October. 
 

Our maturity profile as at 31 December 2021

Our outstanding long-term loans as at 31 December 2021

Loans from the European Investment Bank  790
Targeted longer-term refinancing operations 100
Euro Medium-Term Notes 2119
Total 3009

Our net debt position (nominal interest-bearing debt less cash) decreased in 2021 by € 89 million to € 3,220 million. Gasunie’s solvency at year-end 2021 was 61%, identical to the figure at year-end 2020.

Our financing activities in 2022

In 2022, Gasunie must repay a bond loan of € 369 million and an EIB loan of € 125 million; the repayment of a € 125 million EIB loan and of possibly € 100 million in TLTRO (targeted longer-term refinancing operations) borrowings will follow in 2023.

As more of our Vision 2030 projects are, as planned, approved in the coming years, the need for additional financing will increase, though some of this need will be absorbed by grants. In 2022, we expect to raise up to € 500 million to meet our long-term financing needs, through new bank financing or by issuing bonds. Interest charges will decrease in the near future due to our existing higher-interest bonds maturing in 2022 and 2023: the current interest rates for a 10-year bond are 3 to 4 percentage points lower than the maturing bond. 

Our financing strategy

Value creation for our suppliers

In 2021, Gasunie purchased a total of € 850 million worth of products and services from suppliers. The most important goods and services we procure are the following:  

  • services for construction, management and maintenance of pipeline networks and systems  
  • materials for construction, management and maintenance of pipeline networks and systems 
  • gas, electricity and nitrogen  
  • IT facilities and services  
  • facilities services and temporary staff.  

Origins of raw materials, materials, products and services

Most of what we procure comes from the European Union.

Supplier categories

We classify our product and service groups into the following categories:  

  • strategic: a product and/or service where, due to the risk of reputational damage and the costs of finding a new supplier, stringent requirements are imposed on the supplier of the product and/or service;  
  • critical: a product and/or service where, due to the risk of reputational damage, specific requirements are imposed on the supplier of the product and/or service, though not as stringent as those for strategic products and services;  
  • non-strategic/non-critical: all other products and services are classified as non-strategic and non-critical. 

Value creation through socially responsible procurement

As a capital-intensive TSO operating in two countries, Gasunie is a major purchaser of goods and services. We add internal economic value through our well-defined procurement strategy. Our role as a buyer will increase in the coming years as we implement our Vision 2030 investment agenda. 

In the procurement of materials, engineering and contracting for major projects such as WarmtelinQ and Porthos and for the hydrogen backbone, we use our existing framework contracts as much as possible. We achieve lower transaction costs by procuring these goods and services, where possible, from parties we know through the management and maintenance of our natural gas infrastructure. In a project with several partners, it is decided in mutual consultation which party will arrange which purchases. In practice we see that Gasunie generally procures the goods and services relating to transmission, either on its own or on behalf of the project. 

Many of the construction contracts (i.e. the contractors) required for the construction of the new infrastructure exceed the value set in the existing framework contracts and are therefore specifically put out to tender, possibly throughout the EU. When it comes to non-standard materials or services, we put out a call for tenders in accordance with the EU rules regarding public tendering procedures for specific sectors. 
This may concern individual contracts that only have a bearing on the specific project (such as components for WarmtelinQ, which sometimes require technologies other than those used for CO2, natural gas or hydrogen). In other cases we conclude framework contracts, which can then be used more widely within Gasunie or for other projects. With this approach, we aim to make best possible use of the synergy across the various energy infrastructures.

Before deciding to go ahead with a Vision 2030 project, we aim to have the major contracts (long lead items, materials, contractors) ready so that we can get a picture that is as realistic as possible (financial aspects, lead times) when the time comes to make the FID. 

Our procurement activities in 2021

In 2021 we paid € 850 million in supplier’s bills. We put more than a hundred contracts worth € 250,000 or more out to tender. For our Vision 2030 projects WarmtelinQ and Porthos, we ordered € 136 million in long-lead items.

Procurement of energy

Energy market prices rose sharply in the second half of 2021. It is Gasunie’s current policy to cover a significant part of its energy needs through forward supply contracts. Along with the rise in energy prices, forward prices also rose in the second half of 2021. These developments have led to higher costs for our own energy consumption.

Natural gas consumption

Our natural gas consumption over the past five years was as follows:

(in millions of kWh; conversion factor 9.77 kWh= 1m3)  2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Netherlands   487   485   459   486   519 
Germany   451   484   285   210   216 
           
 Total     938   969   743   696   735 

Electricity consumption

Our electricity consumption over the past five years was as follows:

(in millions of kWh) 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Netherlands  741   705   656   764   690 
Germany  8   9   8   9   8 
           
Total     750   713   665   772   698 

The increase in electricity consumption is partly due to the increase in quality conversion. We have also had to use our compressors more due to the demand for natural gas and the weather conditions. These compressors run partly on natural gas and partly on electricity, which increased the consumption of these resources.

We put our contracts out to tender in accordance with the EU rules on public tendering procedures. The Dutch Public Procurement Act 2012 (special sector contracts), the Tendering Regulations for Utility Sectors 2016 and the Gasunie Tendering Regulations apply to these tendering procedures.

In the selection phase, we ask potential suppliers to complete and validly sign a Tenderer’s Statement. In this statement, the tenderer declares, among other things, that it does not participate in a criminal organisation, corruption, fraud, terrorist crimes, money laundering, child labour or other forms of human trafficking. We use a standard Uniform European Tendering Document from the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy for this.

The tenderer must also be able to present a certificate of conduct for procurement, which is a certificate from the Minister of Justice and Security stating that an investigation into the natural person or legal entity concerned has not resulted in any objections to the party tendering for government contracts. We also conduct due diligence into the supplier’s solvency and the composition of its customer portfolio.

After we have selected the potential supplier, we conduct audits in many cases, to test the supplier’s safety and quality performance. Integrity aspects are also examined in certain cases. After a contract has been concluded, we hold regular Business Review Meetings, as well as specific audits if there is occasion to do so. In the event of persistent underperformance, we may cease working with the supplier in question. 

Value creation through risk-based asset management

Gasunie is a capital-intensive company that is active in a sector with major safety risks. We provide not only reliable and sustainable infrastructure, but also affordable infrastructure. Accordingly, we pay close attention to operating cost-effectively. In 2021 we invested € 90 million in replacement of our infrastructure assets.

Gasunie uses risk-based asset management for this. We map our risks with the help of a risk matrix. A risk assessment is carried out on all hazards/vulnerabilities in the system, during which each of the four business values – security, transport security, sustainability, and financial or other damage – are assessed.  
We use this risk assessment to assess replacement investments. This ensures that as many risks as possible are eliminated in a cost-efficient manner, and that no unnecessary works are carried out. Every year, some of the installations are re-analysed and re-assessed for risks. 

Our updated risk matrix

In 2021 we revised our risk matrix. The risk associated with a hazard/vulnerability is determined based on the level of severity of the impact (rows A to E) and frequency of occurrence (columns -I to V). With regard to the impact (potential negative value creation), not only do we look at the impact on Gasunie, but also at the impact on society. 

Value creation through IT security

A precondition for creating economic and social value and realising our Vision 2030 is that our digital systems, data and information be adequately secured, an understanding shared by our stakeholders, who this year placed IT security higher on our list of material topics.  
To ensure security of our IT systems, we take appropriate measures based on risk analysis, factoring in changing views, ambitions, threats and technology. We regularly review the effectiveness of measures through internal and external audits and assessments.  
Our focus on information security is not solely an inward one. Given the vital importance of an uninterrupted energy supply for the Netherlands, Germany and the rest of Europe, we are increasingly working together with other parties across the energy supply chain and with governments to be able to prevent possible future energy supply disruptions. 

Our IT security measures in 2021

Our IT security measures and results in 2021 were in accordance with the digital threats. There were no disruptions with an impact on the essential business processes. Potential crisis situations and business disruptions, as a result of vulnerabilities in suppliers’ software for example, have been adequately resolved. In 2021, we took proactive security measures where necessary, to address a vulnerability in the printing software for example. In 2021, the Information Security Management Systems of Gasunie Netherlands and Germany will be recertified to the international ISO 27001 standard.

What is Gasunie doing about cybersecurity management?

  • Cybersecurity management is part of our governance structure.
  • We monitor systems, networks, applications and services for incidents, events and threats. The audits cover technology, processes and organization.
  • We take operational measures to monitor and respond to data breaches and cyber attacks.
  • We regularly conduct internal and external security audits and penetration tests of the company's systems, products and practices that affect user data. We also conduct what are known as Red Team exercises.
  • Part of the ISO27001 certifications are the mandatory annual audits. These have been conducted annually for seven years for the Netherlands and five years for Germany, with positive assessments.
  • Governments conduct cybersecurity inspections based on national laws and regulations. In addition, we perform self-assessments required by the Dutch, German, and British governments.
  • We participate in various, (partly) recurring cyber security exercises within the energy transport sector and the government.
  • We make our employees aware of information security risks with e-learning, phishing tests, a live hacking event and mandatory security awareness games

Value creation through cost-efficiency

Roughly 90% of our annual revenue comes from operations in markets where we hold a regulated monopoly. Regulatory authorities see to it that we provide our services at the lowest possible cost to the public. The tariffs that the regulated parts of our GTS and GUD business units charge customers are set by the respective national regulatory authorities every year. They are calculated by dividing the permitted revenues for the year in question by the estimated capacity demand. 

The revenues permitted by the regulatory authorities consist of an allowance for the cost of capital invested, a reimbursement for the annual depreciation costs (calculated on the basis of the depreciation periods determined by the regulatory authority and the value of the assets) and a reimbursement for the operating costs. If the revenues earned differ from the permitted revenues, the difference is settled in subsequent years. The regulatory authorities review their regulatory regime every 3 to 5 years; in the Netherlands the new regulatory period (price control period) starts in 2022, in Germany in 2023.

GTS regulation

On 1 February 2021, regulator ACM published the 2022-2026 methodology decision [methodebesluit 2022-2026], setting the boundaries within which GTS can charge its tariffs. ACM has also opted to change the way in which GTS’ capital costs are spread over time, so as to factor in the future reduction in gas consumption as a result of the energy transition. Various market parties have lodged an appeal against a number of elements of the methodology decision, including GTS. To this end, in December 2021 a notice of appeal was submitted to the Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal (College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven, CBb). GTS’ appeal relates to three elements of the methodology decision: the benchmark, the energy costs and the permitted return.

Benchmark
With respect to the benchmark study - the study based on which a static efficiency of GTS of 93.7% was determined - GTS believes that the robustness of this study is so limited that it does not provide a basis for an efficiency cut-off for GTS. Alternatively, GTS's commitment is a static efficiency score of 100%. In addition to the substantive shortcomings of the benchmark model used, the study is also insufficiently transparent and verifiable. The ACM should still provide the CBb with insight, so that it can still thoroughly check the BM study.

Energy Costs
With regard to the price risk of the costs of energy and power (energy costs), the method decision wrongly does not apply any subsequent calculation. The approach of the ACM, which places the entire price risk on GTS, is based on an incorrect picture of GTS's energy costs. By not applying a post-calculation to GTS's energy costs, the financial risk to GTS of these costs becomes disproportionately large. Where the ACM does take as its starting point the application of post-calculation, namely on the volumes of quality conversion, the post-calculation is done in an incomplete manner. This is because the ACM assumes a unit price per volume of gas converted, rather than per unit of nitrogen produced. GTS's commitment is full post-calculation of the total cost of energy and power, possibly with a limited bonus-malus arrangement.

Return
Finally, GTS believes that the ACM is incorrect in setting the WACC, the regulated rate of return. This concerns both the substantive composition of the WACC (and therefore the level), and the moment at which it does so. Firstly, the ACM has set the cost of equity in the WACC too low because it does not contain all the necessary risk mark-ups and, moreover, it is set in an inconsistent manner. More fundamentally, GTS objects to the fact that the ACM will adjust the WACC annually in arrears, based on the interest rates in that year. This method is contrary to the ex-ante character of the WACC, as has also been endorsed by the ACM and the CBb in the past. GTS's intention is that the missing risk mark-ups will still be applied and that the return will be determined prior to the tariff year.

Within 12 weeks of the filing date, ACM will submit its statement of defence to the Board of Appeal regarding both the appeal from GTS and those of the other market parties. This is followed by an opportunity to respond via a ‘reply and rejoinder’ (i.e. a full second presentation of the appellant’s case) after which a hearing is scheduled. The proceedings are expected to continue throughout 2022 and perhaps longer.

GUD regulation

In 2021 Germany implemented a change to the regulatory framework. The regulation of the gas TSOs and DSOs has been harmonised and simplified. Incentives have also been created to accelerate the development of the German network. This new regulatory framework, which will apply an annual cost of capital comparison, will take effect from 2023. 

Before the start of this new regulatory period, the parameters of the relevant regulatory period – and so also the applicable revenue cap for GUD – will be redefined by the German regulator Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA). In June 2021, GUD submitted its cost application to BNetzA based on the costs incurred in the ‘photo year’ 2020 (the photo year [base year] is three years prior to the first year of the new regulatory period). The consultation process with regard to the cost application started in November 2021, when GUD received the official consultation responses to the initial cost level.  BNetzA will assess the individual efficiency level for GUD that will apply during the upcoming regulatory period.

In October 2021, BNetzA published the equity interest rates for the new regulatory period for electricity and gas networks. The permissible rate of return on equity is 5.07% pre-tax for new assets and 3.51% pre-tax for old assets. Like many other network operators, GUD has filed a lawsuit with the Higher Regional Court in Germany with regard to BNetzA’s determination of equity. In 2022, BNetzA will evaluate a new general efficiency factor that will apply to all TSOs and DSOs in the regulatory period 2023-2027.

Future hydrogen infrastructure regulation

In July 2021, ACM wrote in a memorandum that regulation of the Dutch hydrogen infrastructure is not yet necessary, given the near complete lack of production or consumption of green hydrogen. The hydrogen market that does exist mainly concerns grey hydrogen as a waste or by-product of industry that is purchased by other industrial parties on the basis of bilateral agreements. In December, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy, following the example set by the ACM in its guideline published in September, decided that network operators may build and maintain production installations for alternative energy carriers, such as electrolysers, but may not manage or own them.

German energy legislation was amended in July 2021, making it possible to operate a hydrogen network within (opt-in) or outside (opt-out) a regulated framework. The tariffication rules for hydrogen transmission within a regulated network are governed by the hydrogen network tariff regulation (Wasserstoffnetzentgeltverordnung, H2NEV), which entered into force in November 2021. For example, a rate of return on equity of 9% pre-tax is initially applied for new assets (7.73% pre-tax for old assets); however, this is only guaranteed until the end of 2027.

Value creation through process management

Gasunie wants to apply a more process-driven approach to its operations: process management is a powerful means to achieve organisational goals effectively and efficiently. In 2021, we created more coherence in Gasunie’s business processes and recorded this in our ‘Process House’, this way providing more insight and promoting steering towards objectives and cooperation between departments. The process model also serves as a reference point when drawing up our audit agenda and enterprise architecture (IT) to ensure that our processes, our systems and the control of both are well aligned.  

We also introduced the annual Process Review, in which process owners together with experts evaluate the performance of their processes. Not only does carrying out this review raise the process owner’s awareness of their role in process management, it helps identify potential risks that threaten the process objective and process optimisation opportunities so that these can be followed up. 
Together with our external supply chain partners, we have started drawing up a supply chain process model to help ensure that supply chain processes between our organisations are recorded in a more consistent manner and that we are ‘speaking the same language’.

Value creation through digitalisation

In 2021, Gasunie further elaborated its Digital Ambition for the year 2025. Implementing this digital strategy will help us realise our Vision 2030 goals. Digitalisation, data and IT play a crucial role in the energy transition and the energy system of the future. The illustration (interactive) shows in which areas we will be going digital.

INTERVIEW Ongoing insight into Dutch CO₂ emissions

What can we do to reduce the emissions from our energy consumption? With green sources, of course, but also with insight into how high those emissions actually are. A major step towards providing that insight is the CO2 Monitor, which Gasunie and TenneT presented in November 2021. Anton Tijdink, Electricity Market Analyst at TenneT, and Sander Huizinga, Senior Business Developer at Gasunie, talk about their project. Sander: ‘Behavioural change comes through insight, not through cables and pipelines.’

Read the interview

Volgend hoofdstuk: 07 Our internal social value creation